Wednesday, 29 March 2017

part 2




Abigail Mbaki Bazola 

Audience theory


The hypodermic needle is a theory about audiences , the theory implies that the media has a powerful effect on its audience, so it influences how it's audience think and feel  by simply following instructions and doing as they are told. The hypodermic theory believe that their audience are passive. Quinten Tarantino directed , produced  and edited Django unchained the way he wanted it to  be told ,so that the audience received the film the way he intended for it, also the way he manipulated it by the script , locations he used , the western theme , the shots that way the audience receive the film how he intended it to. The audience learnt about slavery , plantations and history about the slave trade in the way he made the set. So actively the viewers picked to watch Django unchained but passively the audience didn’t know what was going to happen or how the story was going to be told. So they've passively viewed it. The hypodermic needle theory is like a big syringe that Quinten Tarantino has packed with everything he has put in there for the audience to receive and has injected the right amount of what he wants us to see. Quinten Tarantino was very smart when planning the film and it was very successful.
In terms of Rush Hour the audience was active because they intended to watch the film because the audience knew that it was going to be a comedy.
The uses and gratification theory explain why people consume different types of media and what they gain from the information given. From our survey statistic's and focus group it is shown that 41.7%   our audience watched Django unchained by choice and 58.3% did not watch the film by choice but they ended up enjoying the film. In terms of our audience who watched the film Django unchained by choice , they watched the film for their own entertainment ,. The other 58% that did not watch the film by choice had no choice because it was for educational purposes so they had to. Which relates to the Harrold Lasswell theory. Harrold believes that people use the media for their own entertainment just as our audience did. Harrold Lasswell also believes that people use the media for correlation , so for example if they have watched a particular drama soaps which liked ,they will begin to watch different drama soaps because of the experience they gained .In this case most of our audience also watched Django Unchained because of who directed the  film. The director was Quintin Tarantino. Many of our audience are Tarantino fans and they enjoy his movies so they put their trust in him to watch this film because they know that they would enjoy it. Another reason why our target audience watched Django Unchained was because of the main character Jamie Foxx , who played Django.
As for Rush hour the audience also liked the film , they really enjoyed it and found it funny. Thed decided to watch the film by choice because they like the actors such as Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker. The audience said if Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker were not the main stars in Rush hour they would have not watched or have enjoyed the film as much.
The reception theory is a theory that studies how audiences receive and interpret the media that they have consumed. Stuart Hall has created this idea for media and communication studies. This theory has two parts encoding and decoding. Our consumers are a encoding audience , because they have consumed the message that the film makers want to get to people. By doing this the film makers have made the film about slavery knowing that most of their target audience would be black.  They have also  included many historical facts into the film that the audience did not know about before watching the film. The film was also created for educational purposes , to teach the audience more about the slave trade and how slaves were treated. For example the hot box  our  audience from our focus group mentioned that they did not know what a hot box was before watching the film. Many slaves were kept in the hot box as a form of punishment. The film makers used emotional scenes so they can encode their message to their target audience. The audience were also preferred , they understood the messages within the film and agreed with it.  The audience gave a great reception to the film because the film was targeted at people who like western films and people who like historical films. And because the film was based on slavery it gave a great reception to the black community. Everyone's opinions were about the same, because that is the reaction Quinten Tarantino was looking for and he made sure to produce a product like that.
For Rush hour the audience received the film really well , they learnt about the history of china and Kung Fu. 


Daisy Abeka

Audience profiling


Effects of exposure to explicit sexual or violent content.


For our primary research, our focus group shows us that none of the explicit content that we listed such as, racial comments, sexual scenes, blood violence and others effected those in the class who watched the film because that it what made the film interesting. And it’s known because it was directed by Quentin Tarantino, and that is his style of movies. With the responses for Rush hour, there was not a lot of explicit content shown through the film. This did not affect our audience. As the movie was more comedy based and classified at a suitable age.

Effects of advertising

Through our primary research, our audience answered the questions by saying they watched the trailer which made them interested to watch it. The feedback we received also revealed the use of through online and posters which influenced them to watch the film. Another reason why the advertising affected our focus group to watch the movie was also because of the use, of the popular actors such as Jamie Fox, being a known actor, attracted them to also be interested to watch. Rush hour had an effective advertisement due to the use of online trailers, and billboards. As well as the exposure of two famous actors involved which our feedback showed drawn them to watch the movie.

Health concerns

The responses also indicate even though the film there was no health concerns that affected our audience. Rush hour also didn’t have any effect on health or negative effects towards the audience.

Censorship debates

As Django contained a lot of explicit content and violent scenes, it has been classified by the government with an age range. As our focus group learned that the use of exposure t the scenes can cause a negative effective. Django being rated an 18 film was debated due to the negative effects it could have on a younger viewer. 

With Rush hour, the censorship debate classified it as a 15 film. Our audience preferred Rush hour more due to it having less explicit content viewed. And being more family friendly if younger viewers were able to watch.

Responses

Overall the response we received from Django showed that 100% enjoyed watching Django, as 50% of our group liked action films. This indicates a positive response towards the film. Our feedback also shows that Quentin Tarantino films are also enjoyable for the audience, as the use western and action was emerged to create the movie.  The responses we received from rush hour were also positive as, the actors in the film engaged our focus group to be interested to watch it. Another reason for this was also because the genre action comedy was a popular response we received.

Negotiated

In django due to the story behind it, showcasing the story of slavery, the audience negotiated by also saying the negative impact towards the film was the use f violence and the plot twist involved. Bringing a western genre in the film as well which makes the film entertaining to watch, rather than educational. With rush hour being a comedy there were no negotiation through our response , as although it was a crime action, the use of funny and mild adult humour involved made it suitable for the type of movie.

Friday, 24 February 2017

evaluation - final production day - 8/2/17

On this day we did our last run through and a little while after we did our final shoot with a live audience so we could get honest feed back for our show. From how it went, I think it went very well as we didn't have a lot of time to rehearse and even when we did there was a lot of problems, either people weren't in or some people who were filling in didn't make much effort that made it more harder for us and it made the process even longer.




what went well even before the production of the show was the process of pre planning, as we split the task 1 tasks so we could all make an effort and get things done faster. What made it even better is that all knew what we were doing, so it speeded things up even more. after task 1 was done, we shared everything on Google drive so we were all able to get all the work and post it on our blogs.  we decided what we were going to be doing for the final product and I was given the role of lighting, so I had to know all the timings of when I should turn them off, dim them and even bring them back up. 


after all that, and went it came down to the production as a group we had more negatives than positives throughout the whole thing even though we were the ones who had everything ready and were more organised when it came to preproduction. we were missing a lot of things such as our live performers as we were going to have them in our show, they only came in for about two rehearsals and the for the final thing, which were in charge by two members of the group. so without them there we had to improvise and fill in the gap with those who filled in for us.


even though the final thing went well, it was a good and bad experience as we learnt different things about the multi-cam world and how hard it actually in a studio.  we also were taught how the visual mixer works and how it operated within the multi-cam and how it helps with the smooth running of an multi-cam production

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

31/1/17

today we had another run through of 'we are London' as always with our group there were issues but this one was a lot better than yesterdays by far. yet it took ages top set up as people weren't there, didn't help to set up or even people from the other group didn't want to help set up which then made things even longer, and then we were trying to figure out what was going on so we could get started. what it needed to make it more successful was, people need to be on time to do their job, if they were late we cant help that but people fully not turning up and not even telling us was a big big issues for the group. what i discovered when doing a run through was that it was so much stress that wasn't even necessary and i also found that as much as we needed the rehearsals, it was such a waste of time, nothing went to plan.

Monday, 30 January 2017

30/1/17

Today was supposed to be social challenges day to perform there production but as Danielle wasn't in today, tom took over and we had the choice whether we wanted to watch a film or have a run though of one of the shows and we decided to have a run through of 'we are London' because we haven't had enough run through's of our show and it was complete shambles, the time it took to set up, me, Tim, dianni, veera and zain were all ready and knew what we were doing but there were some difficulties, meaning some of our members were late but that was okay because we could work around that and they eventually came in and got their job done. However, people were complaining, finding it difficult with the script and not putting effort into the run through, so half way through we started the show again and then it messed up again so we just carried on and then finished.